OANDP-L
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The O&P EDGE
  • PECOS
  • Magazine
    • Subscription
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • News Archive
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Flipbooks
  • O&P Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • EDGE Advantage
    • EA Homepage
    • EA Data
  • O&P Facilities
  • Resources
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Calendar
    • Contact
    • About Us
    • O&P Library
    • Lower Limb Directory
    • The Guide
    • Custom Publications
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Direct
    • Amplitude Media Group
  • PECOS
  • Magazine
    • Subscription
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • News Archive
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Flipbooks
  • O&P Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • EDGE Advantage
    • EA Homepage
    • EA Data
  • O&P Facilities
  • Resources
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Calendar
    • Contact
    • About Us
    • O&P Library
    • Lower Limb Directory
    • The Guide
    • Custom Publications
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Direct
    • Amplitude Media Group
No Result
View All Result
The O&P EDGE Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Sprinters With Left-Leg Prostheses at a Disadvantage

by The O&P EDGE
March 22, 2016
in News
0
SHARES
19
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A study conducted at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU-Boulder) shows that when rounding curves, Paralympic sprinters who use left transtibial prostheses are slowed more than athletes who use right transtibial prostheses. Athletes with left-leg prostheses who sprinted in the inside lane of an indoor track ran about 4 percent slower than athletes with right-leg prostheses. Based on that, the researchers estimated a 0.2 second difference in an outdoor 200-meter race.

Participants included 11 Paralympic sprinters from the United States and Germany who use transtibial prostheses, as well as six sprinters without amputations. The Paralympic sprinters in the study wore their own customized, J-shaped, carbon fiber running blade prostheses. All participants were timed and filmed running on a straight section of an indoor oval track, running on the curve counterclockwise (standard protocol for track and field races), and running the curve clockwise. The athletes were filmed with a high-speed video camera that recorded their motions at a rate of 210 frames per second.

All participants ran slower on curves compared with straight running, but with different kinematics. The able-bodied cohort ran 1.9 percent slower clockwise compared with counterclockwise, and they reduced stride length and frequency in both curve directions compared with straight running. Sprinters with an amputation ran 3.9 percent slower with their affected leg on the inside of the curve compared with the outside of the curve, and they also reduced stride length in both curve-running directions but reduced stride frequency only on curves with the affected leg on the inside.

The research indicates the performance of Paralympic sprinters was impaired by their reduced ability to generate enough force with their left-leg prostheses while running counterclockwise on the inside of a track curve, said CU-Boulder research associate Paolo Taboga, PhD, chief study author. The athletes had a shorter stride frequency and longer contact time between the blade and the track surface, and were not able to compensate by using more rapid leg-swing times, he said.

“What surprised me the most was the large effect that running on the inside lane of [the] curve had on these elite Paralympic sprinters,” said Taboga. “A 4 percent reduction in speed during a competitive sprint event could mean the difference between a gold medal and no medal at all.”

Taboga suggested that in order to make the Paralympic sprint races more fair, the sprinters with left lower-limb amputations running on a curve should be allowed to run in the outside lanes. The study was published March 15 in the Journal of Experimental Biology.

Editor’s note: This story was adapted from materials provided by the University of Colorado Boulder.

Related posts:

  1. Reversing Scoliosis and Brace Treatment of a Proximal Structural Curve
  2. Survey Says? Findings From the Field’s Largest Study of People With Upper-limb Amputations
  3. Five-year Case Study of an Infant With Scoliosis Using Schroth Therapy and Chêneau-type Bracing
  4. Paralympic Academy Inspires Young Athletes and Coaches
Previous Post

Professors Team Up to Design a Better Prosthetic Arm

Next Post

Australian Engineer Trialing Provision of Low-Cost Prosthetic Legs

Next Post

Australian Engineer Trialing Provision of Low-Cost Prosthetic Legs

 SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE

 

O&P JOBS

Central

Join Our Team as a Certified Pedorthist!

Eastern

Orthotic Fitter

Pacific

CPOs and Clinic Managers

Linkedin X-twitter Facebook

Get unlimited access!

Join EDGE ADVANTAGE and unlock The O&P EDGE's vast library of archived content.
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
The O&P EDGE Magazine
 

Login to your account

  • Forgot Password?

Reset Password

  • Already have an account? Login

Enter the username or e-mail you used in your profile. A password reset link will be sent to you by email.

Close
No Result
View All Result
  • PECOS
  • MAGAZINE
    • SUBSCRIBE
    • CURRENT ISSUE
    • ISSUE ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ARCHIVE
    • PRODUCTS & SERVICES DIRECTORY
    • ADVERTISING INFORMATION
  • O&P JOBS
    • FIND A JOB
    • POST A JOB
  • EDGE ADVANTAGE
    • EA Homepage
    • EA Data
  • FACILITIES
  • RESOURCES
    • PRODUCTS & SERVICES DIRECTORY
    • CALENDAR
    • CONTACT
    • ABOUT US
    • O&P LIBRARY
    • LOWER LIMB DIRECTORY
    • THE GUIDE
    • CUSTOM PUBLICATIONS
    • ADVERTISING INFORMATION
    • EDGE DIRECT
    • AMPLITUDE
  • OANDP-L
  • LOGIN

© 2026 The O&P EDGE

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
 

Account Activation

Before you can login, you must activate your account with the code sent to your email address. If you did not receive this email, please check your junk/spam folder.

Click here to resend the activation email. If you entered an incorrect email address, you will need to re-register with the correct email address.

 

© 2026 The O&P EDGE

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • EDGE Advantage
  • OANDP-L
  • Subscribe

CONTACT US

866-613-0257

info@opedge.com

201 E. 4th St.
Loveland, CO 80537

EDGE DIRECT

The most important industry news and events delivered directly to your inbox every week.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • EDGE Advantage
  • OANDP-L
  • Subscribe

© 2026 The O&P EDGE

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
The O&P EDGE Magazine
 

Login to your account

  • Forgot Password?

Reset Password

  • Already have an account? Login

Enter the username or e-mail you used in your profile. A password reset link will be sent to you by email.

Close
No Result
View All Result
  • PECOS
  • MAGAZINE
    • SUBSCRIBE
    • CURRENT ISSUE
    • ISSUE ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ARCHIVE
    • PRODUCTS & SERVICES DIRECTORY
    • ADVERTISING INFORMATION
  • O&P JOBS
    • FIND A JOB
    • POST A JOB
  • EDGE ADVANTAGE
    • EA Homepage
    • EA Data
  • FACILITIES
  • RESOURCES
    • PRODUCTS & SERVICES DIRECTORY
    • CALENDAR
    • CONTACT
    • ABOUT US
    • O&P LIBRARY
    • LOWER LIMB DIRECTORY
    • THE GUIDE
    • CUSTOM PUBLICATIONS
    • ADVERTISING INFORMATION
    • EDGE DIRECT
    • AMPLITUDE
  • OANDP-L
  • LOGIN

© 2026 The O&P EDGE

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
 

Account Activation

Before you can login, you must activate your account with the code sent to your email address. If you did not receive this email, please check your junk/spam folder.

Click here to resend the activation email. If you entered an incorrect email address, you will need to re-register with the correct email address.