The National Association for the Advancement of Orthotics and Prosthetics (NAAOP) released a statement regarding a recent court decision on the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearings backlog:
On September 19, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (DC) declined to delay proceedings in the ALJ backlog suit filed by the American Hospital Association (AHA) against the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Sylvia Burwell. The court gave strong signals that it will likely order HHS to comply with the 90-day statutory deadline to decide ALJ appeals, but stopped short of doing so in its opinion. Instead, it called for a status conference with the litigants to discuss the matter further on October 3.
AHA filed suit in 2014 against the HHS secretary, seeking a writ of mandamus, which is an order directing a government official to comply with a duty. Here, the duty is to decide ALJ appeals within 90 days as required by the Medicare statute. In December 2014, the court dismissed AHA’s suit. The court believed at that time that the extensive delays in ALJ decisions should be addressed by HHS and Congress, not the courts. AHA appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit).
The DC Circuit reversed the district court. The DC Circuit held that AHA satisfied the core requirements for mandamus jurisdiction because hospitals have a clear right to ALJ decisions in 90 days; the HHS secretary has a clear duty to decide ALJ appeals in 90 days; and hospitals [as well as all other providers] have no adequate alternative remedy other than mandamus. The DC Circuit noted that the ALJ backlog is having a real impact on human health and welfare because some providers are admitting fewer cases that are likely to be targeted by Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs). The DC Circuit remanded to the district court, however, to determine whether Congress and the HHS secretary are making “significant progress” toward solving the ALJ backlog.
The HHS secretary’s first action on remand was to request that the district court stay-delay-proceedings until September 30, 2017, arguing that the agency’s initiatives and legislation pending in Congress would clear the backlog without judicial intervention. AHA opposed the stay under the theory that the HHS secretary’s initiatives would actually result in an increase in the ALJ backlog unless Congress provides substantial additional funding, which is unlikely. Although this case was brought by the AHA, the ultimate decision of the court in this case will apply equally to all providers and suppliers who serve Medicare patients, including orthotists and prosthetists.
On September 19, the district court denied the HHS secretary’s motion to stay. Although the court did not formally decide whether to order the HHS secretary to comply with the deadline, the judge did weigh factors for and against the issuance of a mandamus order when analyzing whether to grant the stay. In other words, the judge was clear that the outcome of the motion would indicate whether or not he would grant the writ of mandamus. In the HHS Secretary’s favor, he noted the intrusiveness of a writ of mandamus and the HHS secretary’s assurances that solving the backlog is a high priority. The court also cited Congress’s awareness of the ALJ delay.
Ultimately, the district court determined that the factors in favor of a writ of mandamus outweigh the factors against it. The court agreed with AHA that the HHS secretary’s current initiatives would not solve the ALJ backlog and would actually result in it growing over time. The court emphasized that “significant progress toward a solution cannot simply mean that things get worse more slowly than they would otherwise.” The court also faulted the HHS secretary for not exercising greater control over the RAC program.
The court concurred that Congress is unlikely to solve the backlog. The court pointed out that the U.S. House of Representatives’ and U.S. Senate’s Committees on the Budget have refused to hold hearings on the president’s 2017 budget, which would provide significant additional funding for ALJs. The court also stated that lack of action on the Audit & Appeals Fairness, Integrity, and Reforms in Medicare (AFIRM) Act of 2015 (S. 2368) to date shows that this bill is unlikely to relieve the backlog in the near term.
Analysis: For all these reasons, the court denied the motion to stay, and at the same time, the court strongly implied that it will order HHS to comply with the ALJ deadline. The court stated, however, that it cannot simply wave a “magic wand” to eliminate the backlog. The court scheduled a status conference for October 3, “to discuss how to proceed.” NAAOP will attend that status conference and provide its members with an update following that conference.
While this decision will not solve the ALJ backlog overnight, it is a very important decision that will place tremendous pressure on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to meaningfully address the over 750,000 cases it has pending at the HHS Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA). This means that O&P practitioners and facilities that have Medicare claims pending at OMHA will likely begin to see some relief from the lengthy delays in getting their ALJ appeals heard and decided. However, the question of when this will occur still remains uncertain. NAAOP will be closely monitoring this situation as developments occur.
