<p style="text-indent: 0in;"><span style="color: #cd1627; letter-spacing: 0.1pt;"><span style="color: #000000;"><img style="float: right;" src="https://opedge.com/Content/UserFiles/Articles/2020-05%2Fgait.jpg" alt="" /></span></span><span style="color: #000000; letter-spacing: 0.1pt;">Researchers at the Methodist </span><span style="color: black;">Rehabilitation Center, Jackson, Mississippi, evaluated changes in temporal-spatial gait characteristics between walking with a non-microprocessor prosthetic knee (NMPK) and a microprocessor prosthetic knee (MPK). They found that most of the tested subjects improved temporal-spatial gait while using the microprocessor prosthetic knee; in one subject, none of the ten gait parameters were in favor of the MPK.</span></p> <span style="color: black;">Using a single-subject ABA/BAB study design, seven NMPK users (all men, age 50-84 years, 3-40 years post-amputation) were transitioned through the ABA or BAB phases (A-NMPK, B-MPK, five weeks each). Four weekly gait evaluations were performed at three self-selected speeds with an electronic walkway. The NMPK-MPK differences in stride length-cadence relationship, prosthetic weight acceptance, single-limb support, and step width were evaluated for each subject.</span> <span style="color: black;">In the BAB group, longer use of the MPK was associated with shorter prosthetic weight acceptance and longer single-limb support times across three speeds. Step width either improved with the MPK or remained unchanged in most subjects.</span> <span style="color: black;">The researchers concluded that the evidence of individual subject improvements in gait coordination, greater reliance on the prosthetic side, and better stability with the MPK than NMPK over a range of walking speeds demonstrates the practical utility of the single-subject method in clinical decision-making. The method was feasible and reliable for documenting changes in gait at the individual level, which is relevant for clinical practice.</span> <span style="line-height: 107%; color: black;">The study was published in </span><em><span style="line-height: 107%; color: black;">Prosthetics and Orthotics International.</span></em>
<p style="text-indent: 0in;"><span style="color: #cd1627; letter-spacing: 0.1pt;"><span style="color: #000000;"><img style="float: right;" src="https://opedge.com/Content/UserFiles/Articles/2020-05%2Fgait.jpg" alt="" /></span></span><span style="color: #000000; letter-spacing: 0.1pt;">Researchers at the Methodist </span><span style="color: black;">Rehabilitation Center, Jackson, Mississippi, evaluated changes in temporal-spatial gait characteristics between walking with a non-microprocessor prosthetic knee (NMPK) and a microprocessor prosthetic knee (MPK). They found that most of the tested subjects improved temporal-spatial gait while using the microprocessor prosthetic knee; in one subject, none of the ten gait parameters were in favor of the MPK.</span></p> <span style="color: black;">Using a single-subject ABA/BAB study design, seven NMPK users (all men, age 50-84 years, 3-40 years post-amputation) were transitioned through the ABA or BAB phases (A-NMPK, B-MPK, five weeks each). Four weekly gait evaluations were performed at three self-selected speeds with an electronic walkway. The NMPK-MPK differences in stride length-cadence relationship, prosthetic weight acceptance, single-limb support, and step width were evaluated for each subject.</span> <span style="color: black;">In the BAB group, longer use of the MPK was associated with shorter prosthetic weight acceptance and longer single-limb support times across three speeds. Step width either improved with the MPK or remained unchanged in most subjects.</span> <span style="color: black;">The researchers concluded that the evidence of individual subject improvements in gait coordination, greater reliance on the prosthetic side, and better stability with the MPK than NMPK over a range of walking speeds demonstrates the practical utility of the single-subject method in clinical decision-making. The method was feasible and reliable for documenting changes in gait at the individual level, which is relevant for clinical practice.</span> <span style="line-height: 107%; color: black;">The study was published in </span><em><span style="line-height: 107%; color: black;">Prosthetics and Orthotics International.</span></em>