This is a very good response to the BOC/ABC situation.
I think Mr. Seaman summarize what should be done.
I am for supporting this if we want the profession to grow stronger. Britt MG Aguilar, CPO.
—–Original Message—–
From: Gary Seaman [mailto:garysea@IAFRICA.COM]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:49
To: OANDP-L@LISTS.UFL.EDU
Subject: Re: [OANDP-L] It is up to you!
Hi All, Tony and Al
I think that Al Pikes question, is the answer. Why is there a need for = two certfication systems? I have in the past year looked into the US certfication process and I have found that neither program is complete. = That what the ABC program lacks the BOC program has and vice versa. This = being, that the entry level into the ABC is too high and that the exit level = of the BOC program is too low. The answer is possibly in the combination of = the two programs so that those candidates who do not have the entry level requirements of ABC but have the determination and skill, still have = the opportunity to achieve the ABC level of certification. I do believe = that a national certification qualification should be compulsory, as the O & P profession is being undermined in the US by underqualified practioners. = At the same time there are many excellent candidates for certification who = do not qualify for ABC certification, but should be given the opportunity. = For example O & P Tech=B4s. Best wishes Gary Seaman Orthotist/ Prosthetist
Confidentiality Note: The preceding e-mail message (including any
attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected = by applicable legal privileges, or constitute non-public information. It = is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you = are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by = replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, = dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients = is not authorized and may be unlawful.
