Saturday, May 21, 2022

Re: Patient or client?Professional or mechanic?

ecat

To me James, you’ll always be a ‘patient’. When I say ‘patient’, please

hear ‘client’. Richard Ziegeler P&O / O.T.

[email protected]

———-

> From: James R. Graham

> To: [email protected]

> Subject: Re: Patient or client?Professional or mechanic?

> Date: Thursday, 22 October 1998 10:22

>

> I understand your points.

>

> However, the idea that making you a “professional” makes me, an amputee a

> “patient” is

> certainly NOT a logical nor valid assumption. I am a client. This does

not

> imply any

> negative connotation for the prosthetist. It’s a simple, physical fact.

> Whether a prosthetist is

> a “tradesman” or “health care professional” is not relevant in

determining

> my status as “patient”

> or “client”. Although I CHOOSE to be a “client” rather than “patient”,

it

> is also a physiological

> sound choice. I’m not sick. I’m not ill. I’m not under a physician’s

> care. I only see a physician

> in order to validate payment to a prosthetist by my insurance company.

> This, I think, is

> a significant distinction.

>

> It does appear ironic that prosthetists are getting a bit defensive about

> titles since amputees

> have been getting defensive about their own status for quite some time.

>

> I don’t care what a prosthetist chooses to be called, or what they refuse

to

> be called.

>

> The bottom line is this….

>

> I’m not a “patient”. I’m a “client”.

> Why? Because I’m not ill and I do not require a physicians care. I have

a

> “stump” (rbk). I’m

> not a diabetic, don’t have heart disease, and there are no lesions. The

> simple fact (and

> irrefutable) is that I’m a completely healthy 42 year old male who just

> happens to wear a

> really large shoe on an otherwise really short leg. That does not, by

any

> stretch of logic

> or imagination make me a “patient”.

>

> I’m a client, and you’re a professional. End of story….

>

> Cheers,

> James R. Graham

> —

> —–Original Message—–

> From: Joe Elliott

> To: [email protected]

> Date: Thursday, October 22, 1998 11:07 AM

> Subject: Re: Patient or client?Professional or mechanic?

>

>

> >To all my colleagues:

> >I am a Certified Prosthetist, a health care professional credentialed by

a

> national health care accreditation organization (ABC) and proud of it. My

> credentials result from the possession of a baccalaureate degree and a

> certificate of education in prosthetics from Northwestern University

> Prosthetic and Orthotic Center. I am pleased to have enjoyed the

recognition

> of other health care professionals for 17 1/2 years I have practiced my

> PROFESSION.

> >

> >I am further pleased that Texas, my state of residence, has take a

positive

> step by adopting a comprehensive licensure act for orthotists and

> prosthetists. I am further pleased that a board consisting of ABC

> practitioners, BOC practitioners and consumers has worked diligently and

> produced a fair and practical document delineating the rules and

procedures

> for implementing the act as adopted by the Texas legislature.

> >

> >I am not, nor have I ever been, a mechanic or tradesman. I have been a

> Professional throughout my career, and the fact that I am now to be

licensed

> by the State of Texas will not change the manner in which I treat the

> patients referred to me for care. The license will, however, provide me

with

> additional recognition, both for patients and payers.

> >

> >I agree, Mr. Barr, this is a positive direction being taken by state

> organizations, and I encourage more state organizations to work to enact

> licensure.

> >

> >Joseph C. Elliott, CP

> >

> >Tony Barr wrote:

> >

> >> I believe Florida O&P consumers can now be described as patients

since

> (Florida) practitionors are now required to have a state license to

> practise their profession(previously a trade.)This recent transition

(July

> 1998) in the state of Florida, of mandatory licensure, and minimumal

> educational standards , raises the status of the O&P practitionor to the

> level of a professional from a tradesman / mechanic identity.

> >>

> >> The prior (optional) certification process did not necessarrily

> quarantee qualification of the practitionor.With the requirement of a

state

> license to practise the profession, goes the recognition, responsibility

and

> accountablity of being a health care professional.

> >>

> >> Perhaps,once the “industry” in other states recognizes the importance

of

> establishing mandatory credentials thru licensure , health care insurance

> providers will revisit and review insurance coverages for O&P

services.The

> beneficiaries of regulation become the patient and the professional.The

> recent expansion of O&P coverage to adults by Florida Medicaid was a

direct

> result of upgrading ,thru regulation ,the image and qualifications of

the

> industry(now a profession in Florida!).

> >>

> >> Perhaps one might ask,”What other occupation deserves the recognition

as

> a profession when no license or certification is required to practice

their

> trade?Espicially when that occupation is health care related “?

> >>

> >> Congratulations Florida O&P PROFESSIONALS!!!

> >> You are leading the way to the transition of a higher standard from

an

> “industry” to a “profession” and your identity as a health care

> professional!

> >>

> >> Anthony T. Barr

> >> The Barr Foundation

> >> www.oandp.com/barr

> >>

> >> > In response to the recent posting regarding referrring to amputees

as

> >> > “patients” instead of “clients”.

> >> >

> >> > I have to respectively disagree with the authors assertion that a

> >> > Prosthetist is no more than a tradesman, or mechanic, who is hired

to

> fill

> >> > an order for a part or supply. I believe that there is a very

> important

> >> > distinction between care giver and mechanic.

> >> >

> >> > Perhaps it is because I work in a hospital setting, but I do not

> believe any

> >> > of the patients that I provide care for, see out relationship as one

> where

> >> > a customer is hiring a mechanic to build them something. Of course

> there

> >> > is a part of what we do that is technical and requires

reimbursement.

> >> > However, I think that it is degrading to the entire Prosthetic

> profession to

> >> > look at what we do as the same as a mechanic.

> >> >

> >> > Without getting to longwinded here, I will pose a couple of

questions

> >> > myself.

> >> > Is the patient / Physical Therapist relationship any different? They

> are

> >> > hired to provide a service. They are paid to do so.

> >> > Is the patient / Surgeon relationship any different? They are hired

to

> >> > work on the body and are also paid to do so.

> >> >

> >> > I do not believe that prosthetists are intentionally trying to

offend

> >> > amputees by referring to them as patients, but when we are called in

as

> >> > part of the rehabilitation team to assist with getting a person back

on

> their

> >> > feet, or back to work, they see it as a patient / care giver

> relationship.

> >> > Thanks for letting me vent a little.

> >> > Steve Fletcher, CPO

> >> > Shands Hospital at the University of Florida

> >> >

> >

RECENT NEWS

Get unlimited access!

Join EDGE ADVANTAGE and unlock The O&P EDGE's vast library of archived content.

O&P JOBS

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

The O&P EDGE Magazine
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?