University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) rehabilitation scientists developed a spinal cord stimulation technique that restored sensation in residual limbs and reduced phantom limb pain following amputation, which they see as a significant advance in prosthetic technology. During testing, the spinal cord stimulation elicited sensation in participants’ missing feet and alleviated phantom limb pain.
Pressure sensors on the insole of a prosthetic foot triggered electrical pulses that were then delivered to the participants’ spinal cords. Researchers found that the sensory feedback also improved balance and gait stability. The proof-of-concept study was done in collaboration with Carnegie Mellon University and University of Chicago researchers.
“We are using electrodes and stimulation devices that are already frequently used in the clinic and that physicians know how to implant,” said Lee Fisher, PhD, associate professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation at Pitt and the study’s senior author. “We are leveraging those technologies to produce meaningful improvement in function and reduction of pain. That’s exciting and we’ve been building it for a while.”
Unlike the typical stimulation system that works by shutting down pain neurons by overriding them with another sensory signal, Fisher’s group leveraged the existing spinal cord stimulation technology to restore sensory feedback by replacing the severed connections between sensory neurons in the missing foot and the central nervous system.
To enable researchers to modulate the intensity of sensations in response to varying pressure on a prosthetic foot during walking, a pair of thin electrode strands implanted over the top of the spinal cord in the lower back was connected to a cell phone–sized stimulation device delivering electric pulses of varying amplitude and frequency. The leads were implanted for one to three months and removed after the trial ended.
Unlike previous research done by other groups, Fisher and team were able to exert active control of spinal cord stimulation parameters to control stimulation in real-time while subjects engaged their prosthetic leg to stand or walk.
In addition to clinically meaningful improvement in balance control and gait even in the most challenging conditions, such as standing on a moving platform with eyes closed, participants reported an average 70 percent reduction in phantom limb pain—a highly meaningful outcome given the lack of clinically available treatment options.
The pilot study showed that it can work in people with extensive peripheral nerve damage due to chronic conditions, such as diabetes, or in people with traumatic amputations. It also doesn’t require costly custom-made electrodes or uncommon surgical procedures, making it easier to scale up on a national level.
“We are able to produce sensations as long as the spinal cord is intact,” said Fisher. “Our approach has the potential to become an important intervention for lower-limb amputation and, with proper support from industry partners, translated into the clinic in the next five years.”
Editor’s note: This story was adapted from materials provided by the University of Pittsburgh.
The study, “Spinal cord stimulation can restore sensation, improve function, and reduce phantom limb pain after transtibial amputation,” was published in Nature Biomedical Engineering.