Sunday, August 7, 2022
OANDP-L
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The O&P EDGE
  • PECOS
  • Magazine
    • Subscription
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • News Archive
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Advertising Information
  • O&P Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • EDGE Advantage
  • O&P Facilities
  • Resources
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Calendar
    • Contact
    • About Us
    • O&P Library
    • The Guide
    • Custom Publications
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Direct
    • Amplitude Media Group
  • PECOS
  • Magazine
    • Subscription
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • News Archive
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Advertising Information
  • O&P Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • EDGE Advantage
  • O&P Facilities
  • Resources
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Calendar
    • Contact
    • About Us
    • O&P Library
    • The Guide
    • Custom Publications
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Direct
    • Amplitude Media Group
No Result
View All Result
The O&P EDGE Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Blade Runners’ Prostheses Give No Competitive Advantage

by The O&P EDGE
January 10, 2022
in News
0
SHARES
149
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

According to research from the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder), sprinters with amputations who use running prostheses have no clear competitive advantage at the 400-meter distance compared to sprinters with biological legs; in fact, they appeared to have a significant disadvantage at the start.

The study provided the most comprehensive data collected from elite runners with bilateral leg amputations, including the world’s fastest 400-meter sprinter, Blake Leeper. Leeper was ruled ineligible to compete in the Tokyo Olympics last year due to having an assumed advantage.

When comparing performance data from Leeper, Oscar Pistorius, and up to six other bilateral amputee sprinters with those of the best non-amputee sprinters in the world across five performance metrics, the research found no advantage, according to the study.

“A lot of assumptions have been made about running prostheses and performance with no data to support them,” said senior author Alena Grabowski, PhD, associate professor of integrative physiology at the university.

For the study, Leeper visited Grabowski’s Applied Biomechanics Lab for a series of tests in 2018. That summer, he had sprinted the 400-meter in 44.42 seconds, breaking the record of Pistorius, the first below-the-knee amputee to compete against able-bodied runners at the Olympic games. After Pistorius’ history-making run in 2012, the International Association of Athletics Federations (now World Athletics) ruled that, going forward, athletes using “mechanical aids” must provide evidence that their blades do not give them a competitive edge.

Leeper enlisted Grabowski, an expert in running prostheses biomechanics who had collected similar data on Pistorius years earlier.

On the treadmill and track, researchers measured Leeper’s acceleration out of the starting blocks, maximum speed along straight-aways and around curves, velocity at aerobic capacity and sprint endurance (all-out effort). They took the top metrics from all available data from elite bilateral amputees and compared them to the top metrics from non-amputees.

“We found that no athlete with prosthetic legs has ever performed better than elite non-amputee athletes in lab-based experiments in any measure that relates to sprinting performance,” said first author Owen Beck, a postdoctoral fellow at Emory University who helped conduct the study.

Athletes using prostheses were 40 percent slower out of the starting blocks, had 19 percent slower velocity at aerobic capacity and were 1-3 percent slower around curves compared to non-amputees.

The authors presented preliminary results to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in 2020 but the court ruled that Leeper could not participate in World Athletics-sanctioned events, including the Olympics, because his prostheses made him too tall. In a previous study published in the journal PLOS One, Grabowski and her colleagues found that height makes no difference when it comes to maximum sprinting speed.

“I hope this will get people to really question rules being put into place that keep athletes with disabilities from competing even when they have shown with science that they can compete fairly,” said Grabowski.

The study, “Sprinting with prosthetic versus biological legs: insight from experimental data,” was published in Royal Society Open Science.

Editor’s note: This story was adapted from materials provided by CU Boulder.

Related posts:

  1. New Study: Sprinting Prostheses Don’t Give Unfair Advantage
  2. Sprinters With Left-Leg Prostheses at a Disadvantage
  3. “Blade Runner” Cleared to Run
  4. Researchers Say Use of Lower-Limb Prostheses Impacts Competitive Running
Previous Post

CRO Prescription Affected by Income Level

Next Post

MPKs Can Reduce Falls for Diabetics With Amputations

Next Post

MPKs Can Reduce Falls for Diabetics With Amputations

  • VIEW CURRENT ISSUE
  • SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE

RECENT NEWS

News

Quarterly TPE Results Released

by The O&P EDGE
July 27, 2022

The medical review department at Noridian, the Jurisdiction A Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractor (DME MAC), released quarterly results...

Read more

NAAOP To Host Virtual Congressional Fly-in

Research Shows Function Improvements With Multiarticulating Hands

ROMP Hires

Get unlimited access!

Join EDGE ADVANTAGE and unlock The O&P EDGE's vast library of archived content.
SUBSCRIBE TODAY

O&P JOBS

Central

CPO – Orthotics and Prosthetics – Full Time

Pacific

CPO

Central

Were Growing!

 

© 2021 The O&P EDGE

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • EDGE Advantage
  • OANDP-L
  • Subscribe

CONTACT US

866-613-0257

[email protected]

201 E. 4th St
Loveland, CO 80537

The most important industry news and events delivered directly to your inbox every week.

No Result
View All Result
  • PECOS
  • MAGAZINE
    • SUBSCRIBE
    • CURRENT ISSUE
    • ISSUE ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ARCHIVE
    • PRODUCTS & SERVICES DIRECTORY
    • ADVERTISING INFORMATION
  • O&P JOBS
    • FIND A JOB
    • POST A JOB
  • EDGE ADVANTAGE
  • FACILITES
  • RESOURCES
    • PRODUCTS & SERVICES DIRECTORY
    • CALENDAR
    • CONTACT
    • ABOUT US
    • O&P LIBRARY
    • THE GUIDE
    • CUSTOM PUBLICATIONS
    • ADVERTISING
    • EDGE DIRECT
    • AMPLITUDE
  • OANDP-L
  • LOGIN

© 2021The O&P EDGE

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
The O&P EDGE Magazine
 
Required 'Candidate' login to applying this job. Click here to logout And try again
 

Login to your account

  • Forgot Password? | Sign Up

Reset Password

  • Already have an account? Login

Enter the username or e-mail you used in your profile. A password reset link will be sent to you by email.

Signup to your Account

  • By clicking checkbox, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

    Already have an account? Login

Close
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
 

Account Activation

Before you can login, you must activate your account with the code sent to your email address. If you did not receive this email, please check your junk/spam folder. Click here to resend the activation email. If you entered an incorrect email address, you will need to re-register with the correct email address.