To PTs: <b> It's All About Education, Training, and Experience</b> I feel compelled to address many of the points raised in The O&P EDGE's April 2003 article, "Physical Therapists: Are They Encroaching on O&P?" I believe that this article twists the truth and portrays the O&P profession in a negative light. What the PTs fail to recognize in their drive to expand their scope of practice and increase personal income is that it is really education, training, and experience that make a good orthotist or prosthetist. It is the problem-solving ability to address patients with unique needs that makes orthotists and prosthetists qualified to provide the care we do. It is our ability to evaluate the patient properly, make or choose the most appropriate device, and fit, adjust, and repair that device to each individual patient's need that is so critical to our patients. O&P practitioners base their decisions on education, training, and experience--not selecting a device because they saw it in a magazine or attended a half-day seminar. Access to orthotic services was also mentioned as a reason why PTs are providing orthotic services. The argument advanced is that since access to orthotic services is a problem, particularly in rural areas, PTs should fill this gap. This statement is like saying, "Since there are no brain surgeons in my area to treat my tumor, I will go see my proctologist, since he has surgical and anatomical training." If physical therapists want to provide orthotic and prosthetic services, I strongly suggest that they receive proper education, training, and certification to do so. Instead, PTs have resorted to amending individual state scope-of-practice laws. I think this is wrong and must be stopped. Physical therapists should not be allowed to accomplish legislatively what they have not accomplished through formal education and training. To do so only risks the quality of orthotic and prosthetic care and gives our profession a bad name. I for one will continue to work with PTs in my state to provide only the highest level of care to my patients. But I will speak out and oppose any effort on the state or federal level that I know in my heart risks injury to patients in need of O&P services. As an amputee, I only want to receive my care from a certified practitioner. O&P services are not DME. I urge all practitioners to join me and stand up for what we know is right. Thomas H. Watson, CP, is president of Tom Watson's Prosthetics & Orthotics Lab Inc, Owensboro, Kentucky, with an additional facility in Evansville, Indiana. He is a past president of the American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association (AOPA). <i>Editor's Note</i>: We encourage and welcome all comments, suggestions and letters to the Editor.
To PTs: <b> It's All About Education, Training, and Experience</b> I feel compelled to address many of the points raised in The O&P EDGE's April 2003 article, "Physical Therapists: Are They Encroaching on O&P?" I believe that this article twists the truth and portrays the O&P profession in a negative light. What the PTs fail to recognize in their drive to expand their scope of practice and increase personal income is that it is really education, training, and experience that make a good orthotist or prosthetist. It is the problem-solving ability to address patients with unique needs that makes orthotists and prosthetists qualified to provide the care we do. It is our ability to evaluate the patient properly, make or choose the most appropriate device, and fit, adjust, and repair that device to each individual patient's need that is so critical to our patients. O&P practitioners base their decisions on education, training, and experience--not selecting a device because they saw it in a magazine or attended a half-day seminar. Access to orthotic services was also mentioned as a reason why PTs are providing orthotic services. The argument advanced is that since access to orthotic services is a problem, particularly in rural areas, PTs should fill this gap. This statement is like saying, "Since there are no brain surgeons in my area to treat my tumor, I will go see my proctologist, since he has surgical and anatomical training." If physical therapists want to provide orthotic and prosthetic services, I strongly suggest that they receive proper education, training, and certification to do so. Instead, PTs have resorted to amending individual state scope-of-practice laws. I think this is wrong and must be stopped. Physical therapists should not be allowed to accomplish legislatively what they have not accomplished through formal education and training. To do so only risks the quality of orthotic and prosthetic care and gives our profession a bad name. I for one will continue to work with PTs in my state to provide only the highest level of care to my patients. But I will speak out and oppose any effort on the state or federal level that I know in my heart risks injury to patients in need of O&P services. As an amputee, I only want to receive my care from a certified practitioner. O&P services are not DME. I urge all practitioners to join me and stand up for what we know is right. Thomas H. Watson, CP, is president of Tom Watson's Prosthetics & Orthotics Lab Inc, Owensboro, Kentucky, with an additional facility in Evansville, Indiana. He is a past president of the American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association (AOPA). <i>Editor's Note</i>: We encourage and welcome all comments, suggestions and letters to the Editor.