Wednesday, March 22, 2023
OANDP-L
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The O&P EDGE
  • PECOS
  • Magazine
    • Subscription
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • News Archive
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Flipbooks
  • O&P Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • EDGE Advantage
  • O&P Facilities
  • Resources
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Calendar
    • Contact
    • About Us
    • O&P Library
    • The Guide
    • Custom Publications
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Direct
    • Amplitude Media Group
  • PECOS
  • Magazine
    • Subscription
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • News Archive
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Flipbooks
  • O&P Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • EDGE Advantage
  • O&P Facilities
  • Resources
    • Product & Service Directory
    • Calendar
    • Contact
    • About Us
    • O&P Library
    • The Guide
    • Custom Publications
    • Advertising Information
    • EDGE Direct
    • Amplitude Media Group
No Result
View All Result
The O&P EDGE Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home News

NAAOP: Healthcare Reform Debate Treats O&P and DME Separately

by The O&P EDGE
August 18, 2009
in News
0
SHARES
7
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The National Association for the Advancement of Orthotics and Prosthetics (NAAOP) has issued a statement regarding the national healthcare-reform debate. The statement appears in its entirety below:

Of the many issues to report in the current debate in Congress over health care reform, it has become clear that the O&P benefit is being treated separately from durable medical equipment (DME). There are several examples that illustrate this separate treatment, and, because this has been a long-standing goal of NAAOP and the O&P profession, these examples are highlighted below. However one feels about the healthcare-reform bills emerging from Congress, it is heartening to know that to date, leaders in Congress finally appear to understand that DME and O&P are separate and distinct, and should be treated differently for policy purposes. This comes after many years of education of policymakers by NAAOP and other O&P organizations. While the O&P profession must remain vigilant, it is an encouraging sign.

  1. Separate coverage in essential-benefits package: One measure of the separate treatment of DME and O&P can be seen in the healthcare-reform legislation passed out of the House Education and Labor Committee in late July. The leadership of this committee addressed the concerns of NAAOP, Alliance organizations, and disability groups by clarifying that all private health plans that participate in a new “Health Insurance Exchange” must cover assistive devices for people with disabilities. In the past, it was typical for Congress to have simply included a specific reference to “durable medical equipment,” assuming that orthotics and prosthetics would be included within the confines of that term. However, the Committee bill states in statute that “durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies” are considered “essential benefits” under all private health-insurance plans offered under the Exchange. Not only does this language make it clear that O&P benefits are covered, but it draws an explicit distinction between these benefits and durable medical equipment.
  2. O&P spared by amendment that cuts DME fee schedule: On the last day of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s mark-up of health-reform legislation, an unexpected amendment was offered to improve cancer treatment and reimbursement under the Medicare program. To help pay for the cost of these changes, an offset was proposed that would reduce the annual CPI-U increase to the Medicare DME fee schedule by one half of one percent each year for the next four years. The amendment passed, and the amendment was added to the underlying health-reform bill reported out of the Energy & Commerce Committee. While this is bad news for DME suppliers and will likely be aggressively fought by that field, the reduction in reimbursement does not apply to the O&P fee schedule. This is largely due to the fact that the Medicare statute lists the O&P benefit in a separate place from the DME benefit. O&P is separate and distinct from DME in the law and the legislation adopted by the Energy & Commerce Committee recognized that fact. The committee did not automatically assume that DME includes O&P, and this separate treatment accrued to the benefit of the O&P profession.

For a profession that has long sought separate and distinct treatment from policymakers, these developments offer significant evidence that the advocacy efforts of NAAOP and the Alliance organizations over the past decade or more are having the desired effect.

Related posts:

  1. Healthcare Reform at an Impasse: Impact of Reform on O&P Patients and Providers
  2. Healthcare Issues Feature Prominently in 112th Congress Agenda
  3. Taking Stock of the O&P Policy Agenda: Part One
  4. The Debt Limit Deal and Its Impact on Healthcare Providers and the O&P Profession
Previous Post

CMS Changes Stock-and-Bill Rules

Next Post

Participants Sought for Amputee-Sexuality Study

Next Post

Participants Sought for Amputee-Sexuality Study

  • VIEW CURRENT ISSUE
  • SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE

RECENT NEWS

News

Muscle Activity Changes With AFO, KAFO Use

by The O&P EDGE
March 14, 2023

To determine whether changes in neural control depend on wearing an orthosis during gait, a team of researchers measured the...

Read more

Trunk Asymmetry Improves With New Scoliosis Bracing Method

Noridian Hosting Lower-limb Prosthesis Prior Authorization Webinar

Inertial Sensors’ Gait Detection Increases Patient Safety

Get unlimited access!

Join EDGE ADVANTAGE and unlock The O&P EDGE's vast library of archived content.
SUBSCRIBE TODAY

O&P JOBS

Pacific

CPO/CP

Mountain

Need OP Team Member

Pacific

Assistant Professor WOT and Assistant Teaching Professor

 

© 2021 The O&P EDGE

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • EDGE Advantage
  • OANDP-L
  • Subscribe

CONTACT US

866-613-0257

[email protected]

201 E. 4th St
Loveland, CO 80537

The most important industry news and events delivered directly to your inbox every week.

No Result
View All Result
  • PECOS
  • MAGAZINE
    • SUBSCRIBE
    • CURRENT ISSUE
    • ISSUE ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ARCHIVE
    • PRODUCTS & SERVICES DIRECTORY
    • ADVERTISING INFORMATION
  • O&P JOBS
    • FIND A JOB
    • POST A JOB
  • EDGE ADVANTAGE
  • FACILITES
  • RESOURCES
    • PRODUCTS & SERVICES DIRECTORY
    • CALENDAR
    • CONTACT
    • ABOUT US
    • O&P LIBRARY
    • THE GUIDE
    • CUSTOM PUBLICATIONS
    • ADVERTISING
    • EDGE DIRECT
    • AMPLITUDE
  • OANDP-L
  • LOGIN

© 2023The O&P EDGE

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
The O&P EDGE Magazine
 
Required 'Candidate' login to applying this job. Click here to logout And try again
 

Login to your account

  • Forgot Password? | Sign Up

Reset Password

  • Already have an account? Login

Enter the username or e-mail you used in your profile. A password reset link will be sent to you by email.

Signup to your Account

  • By clicking checkbox, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

    Already have an account? Login

Close
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
 

Account Activation

Before you can login, you must activate your account with the code sent to your email address. If you did not receive this email, please check your junk/spam folder. Click here to resend the activation email. If you entered an incorrect email address, you will need to re-register with the correct email address.